Case 1403671/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Wallis v Portsmouth Fibreglass Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403671/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Wallis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 2 December 2019, to explain why the claim should not be dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to make an order in the terms requested in the claimant's email of 21 November 2019. The claimant responded by email on 2 December 2019.
Employment Judge Gray recorded that the claimant had failed to make any sufficient representations against dismissal. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment contains no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive basis of the claim in the reasons. The gov.uk listing for the case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages, but the tribunal's reasons only say it lacked jurisdiction to make an order in the terms requested in the claimant's email of 21 November 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.