Case 1403672/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Pun, Claimants brother. For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403672/2021
- Decision date
- 28 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr N Knight, Mr J Shah
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Pun, Claimants brother. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed. That finding is recorded in paragraph 1 of the judgment. No remedy was determined in this judgment, because a separate one-day hearing was listed to address remedy.
On race discrimination, the tribunal upheld one direct discrimination complaint under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment states that the respondent failed to take steps to address concerns raised by the claimant in the grievance process, and that failure was the basis for the successful claim.
All other race discrimination claims were dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the claimant’s victimisation complaints under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was constructively dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | One direct race discrimination complaint under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded because the respondent failed to take steps to address concerns raised by the claimant in the grievance process. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | All other race discrimination claims under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claims under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 were each dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.