Case 1403673/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Dioneza v AND Willsecure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403673/2021
- Decision date
- 25 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Dioneza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. It therefore determined the claim in chambers without a defended hearing. The respondent was named as Willsecure Limited and the claimant was Mr M Dioneza.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages. It ordered the respondent to pay 144 hours' pay in the gross sum of £1,440.00.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. It ordered the respondent to pay 88.5 hours' pay in the gross sum of £885.00. The judgment records the awards as gross sums and does not separate the remedies further.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered payment of 144 hours' pay in the gross sum of £1,440.00. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered payment of 88.5 hours' pay in the gross sum of £885.00 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,325
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.