Case 1403683/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Emily Wise v First Thought Care Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403683/2023
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Emily Wise
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal granted the respondent's application for an extension of time to file its ET3 and accepted that the claimant's employment ended on 27 February 2023, when she was told she had failed probation, was told not to return to work, and was paid four weeks' pay in lieu of notice. The tribunal found that the notice period was one week.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted the employer's records over the claimant's text-message record and found that she had taken 93 hours of leave during employment, against an entitlement of 78 hours. That left 15 hours over-taken leave, which the tribunal calculated as a lawful deduction of £288.46. It found that the respondent had deducted £1,081.73 in respect of holiday-related sums, leaving £793.27 due to the claimant.
On the £500 training fee, the tribunal found there was no signed contract of employment and therefore no contractual agreement authorising the deduction. It also found that the signed training document did not state the £500 figure, and that the email relied on by the respondent referred to repayment if the claimant chose to leave, whereas she had been dismissed. The tribunal therefore found the £500 deduction was unauthorised. The claim was upheld and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,293.27 gross in total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the single unlawful deductions from wages complaint. The award comprised £793.27 for holiday pay deductions and £500 for the training fee; the judgment did not split these into separate claims. | Upheld | — | £1,293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,293
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.27 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.14(4)(a) ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.