Case 1403688/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Jonathan Hall v Axminster Town Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403688/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hastie Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jonathan Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJonathan Hall brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Axminster Town Council. The case was heard at Bristol by video on 5 and 6 June 2023 before Employment Judge Hastie, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal's written judgment records only the outcome: the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The extracted text does not include the tribunal's substantive reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing rather than in a written judgment.
The written record also states that no written reasons will be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard post-hearing process. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. No written reasons are provided in the extracted judgment text; it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.