Case 1403695/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr Carl Bevan, Director — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403695/2022
- Decision date
- 15 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smail heard the case at Exeter by video on 21 December 2023. The Claimant, Peter Hall, appeared in person and the Respondent, Bevan & Co. Haulage Ltd, was represented by Mr Carl Bevan, Director.
The tribunal held that the Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings/breach of contract was well-founded. No further reasoning is set out in the extracted judgment text, and no separate findings are recorded for any other claim.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £831 within 14 days. The judgment does not break the award into separate components and does not record any additional remedy calculation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings/breach of contract was well-founded and orders payment of £831 within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £831 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £831
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.