Case 1403704/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v - Mr D Roberts — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403704/2022
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone at Bristol before Employment Judge Mr P Cadney on 11 August 2023, held that the claimant's claims were well founded. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate factual findings or legal reasoning beyond that conclusion.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, 3Tone Ltd, to pay gross notice pay of £3,750, gross unpaid salary of £3,750, accrued but unpaid holiday pay of £612.44, and unpaid expenses of £176.89. The judgment records these sums as the claimant's successful claims and does not split the award into broader compensation categories. The total monetary award from the listed heads is £8,289.33.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as gross notice pay; the extracted judgment does not set out a separate legal basis beyond the listed head of claim. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross unpaid salary; the extracted judgment does not specify any further reasoning or statutory label. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as accrued but unpaid holiday pay; the extracted judgment gives no further analysis. | Upheld | — | £612 |
| Other | Awarded as unpaid expenses; the extracted judgment does not identify a specific statutory or contractual basis. | Upheld | — | £177 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,289
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.