Case 1403711/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Edwards v Pilgrim Pasties Ltd (in Voluntary Creditors Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403711/2019
- Decision date
- 22 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Edwards
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Miss J Edwards' claim against Pilgrim Pasties Ltd (in Voluntary Creditors Liquidation). The judgment records that, by a letter dated 7 September 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the underlying claim; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.