Case 1403712/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Benjamin Ward v Pitch Foods Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403712/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Benjamin Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Southampton Employment Tribunal hearing on 5 and 6 June 2023 before Employment Judge Lang, the tribunal was informed that terms of settlement had been agreed between Benjamin Ward and Pitch Foods Limited. The judgment therefore did not determine the merits of the breach of contract, unfair dismissal, or unlawful deduction from wages claims.
The order adjourned the case until 4pm on 4 July 2023 to allow the settlement terms to be implemented. It stated that if neither party applied to restore the matter to the hearing list by that time and date, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and, with the claimant's consent, would stand dismissed without further order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. The order provided that, if neither party applied to restore the matter by 4pm on 4 July 2023, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. The order provided that, if neither party applied to restore the matter by 4pm on 4 July 2023, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. The order provided that, if neither party applied to restore the matter by 4pm on 4 July 2023, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.