Case 1403717/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v 15:17 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403717/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 16 December 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Dawson determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 25 March 2022 was cancelled.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £495.41. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £534.60. The judgment does not break the award down into broader compensation components beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £495.41 under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £495 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £534.60 under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £535 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,030
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.