Case 1403726/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403726/2022
- Decision date
- 14 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms P Todorova, brought claims against Caspian Networks Ltd and McDonald’s Restaurants Ltd. The tribunal sat at Bristol on 3 July 2023 before Employment Judge Cadney sitting alone. The judgment records that no substantive liability findings were made in this decision because the claims were not determined on their merits.
As to the first respondent, Caspian Networks Ltd, the claimant’s claims for detriment on the grounds of public interest disclosure, direct age discrimination, direct race discrimination, unlawful deduction from wages, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not give further reasoning for the withdrawal or any findings on the underlying facts.
As to the second respondent, McDonald’s Restaurants Ltd, the claimant’s claims for direct age discrimination, unlawful deduction from wages, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not set out a fuller reasons section or identify any monetary remedy, and no award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Against the first respondent, described as a claim for detriment on the grounds of public interest disclosure; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Against the first respondent; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Against the first respondent; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Against the first respondent; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Against the first respondent; accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Against the second respondent; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.