Case 1403741/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Carradine v 1 Star Care (Bristol) Ltd 2 Ms T Alway Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403741/2020
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Carradine
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found as a preliminary issue that Miss Carradine was a disabled person from 7 January 2020 and not before. It then held that her disability discrimination claims had been presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable for them to go forward, so those claims did not proceed to a merits hearing.
The only further case management direction recorded in the judgment was that the claimant was to serve full particulars of her holiday pay claim on the respondent by 27 August 2021. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person from 7 January 2020 and not before, but held that the disability discrimination claims were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable for them to proceed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.