Case 1403745/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did Not Attend For the v Mrs G Carlton — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403745/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did Not Attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a monetary claim for unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent denied the claim. The hearing took place remotely on the papers. The claimant did not attend, and his application for a postponement was refused. Mrs Grace Carlton attended for the respondent and gave evidence, which the tribunal accepted.
The tribunal found that the respondent engaged the claimant, a chef, as a relief chef on 13 July 2019 on a self-employed basis at £18 per hour, with accommodation also provided. After he started work, complaints were made about the food, and the respondent refunded six groups of diners. The tribunal accepted Mrs Carlton's evidence that the relationship was terminated after about an hour because the situation was immediately unsustainable.
Although the claimant was not an employee, the tribunal found that he was a worker within section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and so could bring a claim under sections 13 and 23. It held that he had worked for one hour and was entitled to be paid for that hour, but he was not entitled to recover for the additional hours claimed on his invoice because those hours had not been worked.
The claim therefore succeeded only in part, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £18.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal treated the claim as succeeding only to a limited extent: the claimant was entitled to be paid for one hour's work, but not for the additional hours invoiced but not worked. | Upheld | — | £18 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 13 and 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.