Case 1403745/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Atkinson v Mirage Inks Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403745/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Atkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Mirage Inks Ltd did not intend to defend the claim. The Employment Judge therefore determined the matter without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay Mr G Atkinson's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay him £3,233.90, which was also stated to be the total sum payable under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not intend to defend the claim. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £3,234 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,234
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.