Case 1403764/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Bale of Counsel For the v Mr Singh, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403764/2021
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Bale of Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for discrimination on the grounds of race and religion or belief, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, accrued but unpaid holiday pay, and breaches of the Working Time Regulations 1998 were all dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment states that this disposal did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were dealt with separately in the Case Management Summary of the same date.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in this judgment. The only recorded outcome for the listed claims is withdrawal by the claimant, and no monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Breaches of the Working Time Regulations 1998 dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.