Case 1403765/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sandra Easton v AND Mr Keith D Twitchett Trading as The Plume of Feathers — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403765/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sandra Easton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in chambers on 12 January 2022 and recorded that the respondent had indicated that he did not resist the claims, so judgment was entered under Rule 21. The claimant, Mrs Sandra Easton, was awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,980.00, calculated in the judgment as 6 x 1.5 x £220.00.
The claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay six weeks' notice pay of £1,320.00. The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded, with an award of one week's pay of £220.00.
The judgment also records that the claimant need not attend the hearing listed for 4 February 2022. No discrimination issues, legal tests, or additional remedy components are identified in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment ordered under Rule 21; the judgment states the amount as 6 x 1.5 x £220.00. | Upheld | — | £1,980 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for six weeks' notice pay succeeded under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,320 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded under Rule 21; the judgment orders one week's pay. | Upheld | — | £220 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,520
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.