Case 1403765/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Jones v Briggs and Forrester Engineering Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403765/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Jones, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Briggs and Forrester Engineering Services Ltd. The hearing took place at Bristol by video-CVP on 3 and 4 January 2024 before Employment Judge Livesey, with Mr Jones appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms Martin of counsel.
The written record states that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was found not well founded and was dismissed. No separate written reasons are included in the record provided. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard notice.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The extracted record contains no discrimination, whistleblowing, redundancy, contractual, or wage claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.