Case 1403766/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v R Maluga T/a Glenville Road Post Office — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403766/2023
- Decision date
- 20 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment page is procedural only. It records that Employment Judge Gray sat by video on 20 October 2023, that the claimant did not attend and was not represented, and that the respondent also did not attend and had not entered a response, so Rule 21 applied.
The record states that because the claimant was unable to attend, it was communicated that a Rule 21 judgment could be issued and refers to a separate judgment. No substantive liability findings, claim-by-claim outcomes, or monetary award are set out in the extracted text provided here.
The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the face of the extracted page, there is no reliable basis to extract any substantive claim outcome or remedy figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted page does not record any substantive claim finding or remedy. It only notes that a Rule 21 judgment could be issued and refers to a separate judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.