Case 1403774/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Airstone v Phil, Abbie, Sam (owner) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403774/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Airstone
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 22 April 2022, it gave Mr N Airstone an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any findings on the substantive merits of the pleaded issues, and it does not set out any monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not separate the pleaded issues; it states only that 'the claim is struck out'. This claim type is inferred from the case listing context provided for extraction. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate the pleaded issues; it states only that 'the claim is struck out'. This claim type is inferred from the case listing context provided for extraction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.