Case 1403775/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Williams v Secret Scty Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403775/2023
- Decision date
- 6 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss D Williams brought a claim against Secret Scty Ltd in the Bristol Employment Tribunals. The judgment was issued under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss Williams £2,604.15 gross in respect of those deductions.
The judgment states that the claimant is to receive £2,604.15 in total. The hearing listed for 20 October 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,604.15 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,604 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,604
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.