Case 1403784/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr S Morris (2) Mrs S Morris v Khan Morris Accountants Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403784/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr S Morris (2) Mrs S Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment in case 1403784/2020 and 1404367/2020. For the first claimant, Mr S Morris, the tribunal recorded that the complaints of failing to make a redundancy payment, unlawful deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay and breach of contract relating to notice succeeded. It awarded £2,271.65 for redundancy pay, £2,187.50 for wages, £151.44 for holiday pay and £959.14 for notice pay, making a subtotal of £5,569.73.
The judgment then deducted sums already received of £3,705.73, leaving £1,864.00 outstanding for Mr S Morris. The same complaints succeeded for the second claimant, Mrs S Morris, with awards of £2,174.50 for redundancy pay, £607.92 for wages, £42.09 for holiday pay and £687.42 for notice pay, producing a subtotal of £3,511.93. After deducting £2,744.95 received, the balance outstanding was £766.98. No further reasons are set out in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Both claimants succeeded. Mr S Morris was awarded £2,271.65 and Mrs S Morris was awarded £2,174.50. | Upheld | — | £4,446 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Both claimants succeeded. Mr S Morris was awarded £2,187.50 and Mrs S Morris was awarded £607.92. | Upheld | — | £2,795 |
| Holiday pay | Both claimants succeeded. Mr S Morris was awarded £151.44 and Mrs S Morris was awarded £42.09. | Upheld | — | £194 |
| Breach of contract | Both claimants succeeded on notice pay. Mr S Morris was awarded £959.14 and Mrs S Morris was awarded £687.42. | Upheld | — | £1,647 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,631
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.