Case 1403803/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Pickett v Coastal Drains Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403803/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Belton Representation
- Venue
- Bristol via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Pickett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Belton heard the case at Bristol via CVP on 11 March 2022. The Respondent did not attend. The judgment records three awards in favour of Mr Pickett: £352 for an unlawful deduction from wages for the period 16 to 19 August 2021 inclusive, and £300 for an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from non-payment in lieu of three days' accrued but untaken holiday.
The tribunal also awarded £1,000, described as two weeks' gross pay, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. No separate remedy breakdown is given beyond these three sums. The total amount awarded is £1,652.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages for the period 16-19 August 2021 inclusive. | Upheld | — | £352 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for failure to pay in lieu of three days' accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Other | Award of two weeks' gross pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because the Respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,652
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.