Case 1403816/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Skuse v Clyst Hydon Pub Company Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403816/2022
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Skuse
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 March 2023, the tribunal gave Ms Skuse an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with tribunal orders dated 17 April 2023 and 7 June 2023, and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the claim for notice pay had no reasonable prospect of success following the respondent's insolvency and the payment to the claimant of sums in satisfaction of notice pay by the Insolvency Service.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claim for notice pay had no reasonable prospect of success following the respondent's insolvency and payment to the claimant of sums in satisfaction of notice pay by the Insolvency Service. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.