Case 1403825/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs Boseley (a Trustee of the Respondent) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403825/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 3 January 2024, Employment Judge Gray recorded a consent judgment between Ms A Anderson and Chat Cafe CIO. The tribunal stated that the breach of contract claims between the parties were dismissed on withdrawal. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
By consent, the Respondent agreed to pay the Claimant £864.50 gross in respect of accrued but untaken holiday and to pay £189 into the Claimant’s NEST account. The parties also agreed not to say or write anything defamatory or derogatory about the other. The written record sent to the parties on 16 January 2024 records no further substantive findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the breach of contract claims between the parties were dismissed on withdrawal by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,054
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.