Case 1403826/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v MSV Enterprises Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403826/2019
- Decision date
- 4 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Emerton sat alone by telephone at Bristol on 7 May 2020. The respondent was not represented and had not filed a response. The tribunal therefore dealt with liability under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and recorded that the claimant's claims succeeded.
The successful claims were for a statutory redundancy payment, unauthorised deduction of wages, and failure to pay holiday pay. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or whistleblowing issues were identified in the judgment. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
At remedy, the tribunal awarded the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £3,528.80. It also ordered the respondent to pay £5,132.80 in respect of unauthorised deduction of wages and £131.20 in respect of holiday pay. The judgment noted that the wage and holiday pay sums may be liable for deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded a successful claim for unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered payment by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £5,133 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded a successful claim for failure to pay holiday pay and ordered payment by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £131 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded under rule 21, following the respondent's non-response. | Upheld | — | £3,529 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,793
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,264
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.