Case 1403830/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wells v Coverwell services — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403830/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 February 2023, the tribunal gave Mr J Wells an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits of the underlying claims. It is a procedural disposal only, made by Employment Judge Livesey on 23 February 2023 and sent to the parties on 9 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately set out the factual basis of the underlying claim, but the case listing identifies unfair dismissal as one of the listed claim types. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately set out the factual basis of the underlying claim, but the case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the listed claim types. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.