Case 1403837/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gil Miss D Dudkiewicz v Casual Dining Services Ltd (dissolved) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403837/2020
- Decision date
- 19 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gil Miss D Dudkiewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned claims by Mr S Gil and Miss D Dudkiewicz against Casual Dining Services Ltd, which was described as being in administration. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 19 April 2021, the claimants were given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because Companies House records stated that the respondent was in administration and the tribunal had received no response from the Administrator confirming consent to the claims proceeding.
The tribunal found that the claimants failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. Employment Judge Roper therefore struck out the claim. The judgment did not identify the underlying causes of action and did not record any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the specific cause or causes of action. It states that the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.