Case 1403840/2020 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403840/2020
- Decision date
- 29 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol on 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14 March 2022, heard the claimant's claims against HM Land Registry. The judgment records that the claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010, failure to make reasonable adjustments under s.20 Equality Act 2010, and victimisation under s.27 Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim presented as discrimination arising from disability contrary to s.15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim presented as failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to s.20 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Claim presented as victimisation contrary to s.27 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.