Case 1403842/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Gilliver v Whitbread Group plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403842/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr J Ruddick, Mrs C Earwaker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Gilliver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims against Whitbread Group PLC were dismissed. The judgment does not set out written reasons, stating that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The judgment identifies the hearing as taking place at Southampton on 20, 21 and 22 August 2019 before Employment Judge Dawson, Mr J Ruddick and Mrs C Earwaker. It contains no findings of fact, legal analysis, or remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed. The gov.uk category indicates unfair dismissal, but the judgment gives no written reasons or separate claim-by-claim wording. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed. The gov.uk category indicates disability discrimination, but the judgment gives no written reasons or separate claim-by-claim wording. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.