Case 1403843/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403843/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
- Panel members
- Ms Eden, Ms Kaye
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by video from 15 to 18 November 2021. The judgment record names the claimant as Mrs J Denniff and the respondent as Prima Dental Manufacturing Limited t/a Prima Dental Group. The tribunal was chaired by Employment Judge Gray, with members Ms Eden and Ms Kaye, and the claimant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by Mr A Roberts of counsel.
In its unanimous judgment, the tribunal dismissed the claimant’s complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, and discrimination arising from disability. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s reasons because those reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment record also states that no written reasons will be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy was identified for any individual claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Described in the judgment as a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.