Case 1403860/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Major v TJ Morris T/A Home Bargains — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403860/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Major
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint. Its reasons state that, by letter dated 28 October 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out. The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability on the merits of that claim, and it does not set out any award of compensation or other remedy in relation to it.
The reasons also note that the claimant’s remaining claim was still listed for a hearing on 24 June 2021 at 12:00 by telephone. That remaining claim was not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By a letter dated 28 October 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.