Case 1403875/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Goodwin v Milestone Garage (M C Hauffe & Sons) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403875/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Goodwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 52 judgment on withdrawal in case 1403875/2019 before Employment Judge Livesey. The extracted judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr P Goodwin.
No remedy was awarded, and the extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on liability. The case listing categories supplied for the record identify breach of contract and unfair dismissal as the claim types, but the judgment text itself does not break the claims down further.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the individual claim heads in the extracted text; layer 1 lists breach of contract as one of the case categories, and the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the individual claim heads in the extracted text; layer 1 lists unfair dismissal as one of the case categories, and the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.