Case 1403879/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Staniscia-Mason - consultant For the v Mr R Fieldhouse – former club secretary — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403879/2019
- Decision date
- 17 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Staniscia-Mason - consultant For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol on 1 and 2 December 2021 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The judgment records the claimant as Mrs J Hunt and the respondent as The 49 Social Club. No lay members are listed, and written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. The short written record does not set out the tribunal’s factual reasoning on that claim, and no legal test is named in the extracted text.
The judgment also records claims for unlawful deductions from wages and arrears of holiday pay. Those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal, so there was no merits determination or monetary award recorded for them. No remedy figures are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to arrears of holiday pay and states that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.