Case 1403881/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Kingham v Little Lambs Pre-School — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403881/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Kingham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record states that the claimant, Miss H Kingham, brought a claim for accrued but unpaid holiday against Little Lambs Pre-School. At the hearing in Bristol before Employment Judge J Bax, the claimant was represented by Mr Gilvear of the Citizens Advice Bureau and the respondent by Revd Wigmore for the management committee.
The only substantive disposal recorded in the written judgment is that the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday was withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment states that the claim was dismissed upon that withdrawal. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the written record.
No monetary award is recorded. The written reasons note that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, so the public record contains only the withdrawal-based disposal of the holiday claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday was dismissed upon its withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.