Case 1403885/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Guenon-Bronson v A Great Read Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403885/2019
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Guenon-Bronson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms R Guenon-Bronson was unfairly dismissed by A Great Read Limited. It also held that she was dismissed in breach of contract and that she was entitled to an award in respect of notice pay.
The judgment states that both the compensatory award and the basic award are to be reduced by 10% for contributory fault under ss. 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record was issued on 26 March 2021 after the hearing on 25 and 26 March 2021.
A separate order directed a remedy hearing on 1 April 2021. No quantified monetary award is set out in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It recorded that the compensatory award and basic award would be reduced by 10% for contributory fault under ss. 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and directed a separate remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and entitled to an award in respect of notice pay. Quantum was not determined in this judgment and was left to the separate remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss. 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.