Case 1403887/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Doe v Mercare SW Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403887/2021
- Decision date
- 20 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Doe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with two applications. The Claimant’s application for an Itemised Pay Statement was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The Claimant’s application for a redundancy payment was found well-founded. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £239.29 in respect of that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Claimant’s application for an Itemised Pay Statement was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The Claimant’s application for a redundancy payment was found well-founded and the Respondent was ordered to pay £239.29. | Upheld | — | £239 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £239
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.