Case 1403894/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Evans v Maritime and Coast Guard Agency — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403894/2020
- Decision date
- 21 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment dated 21 March 2022, Employment Judge Rayner Date struck out the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination in their entirety under Rule 37. The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had not complied with earlier case management orders dated 3 December 2021 and 7 February 2022, had not provided disclosure, had not agreed an index or bundle of documents, and had not exchanged witness statements.
The Tribunal referred to a strike-out warning issued on 16 March 2022, which gave the claimant until 12 noon on 18 March 2022 to respond. No response was received. The Tribunal held that a fair hearing was no longer possible by the hearing listed for 22 to 25 March 2022, so the four-day hearing was vacated.
In reaching that conclusion, the Tribunal referred to Rule 37(1)(c) and Rule 37(1)(d), and to the authorities in Weir Valves & Control (UK) Ltd v Armitage, Birkett v James, and Khan v London Borough of Barnet. The reasons state that the claimant had been given a number of opportunities to comply, but since the amended orders of 7 February 2022 he had provided no reason for his lack of engagement and had not demonstrated a real intention to progress the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out in its entirety under Rule 37 after the claimant failed to comply with Tribunal orders and did not respond to the strike-out warning. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out in its entirety under Rule 37 after the claimant failed to comply with Tribunal orders and did not respond to the strike-out warning. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- Weir Valves & Control (UK) Ltd v Armitage
- Birkett v James
- Khan v London Borough of Barnet
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.