Case 1403895/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Shaun Cripwell v Steve Wallace Transport Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403895/2021
- Decision date
- 7 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gibb Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Shaun Cripwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, at Bristol by CVP on 18 March 2022 before Employment Judge Gibb, found that Steve Wallace Transport Limited had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay Mr Shaun Cripwell in respect of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.
The written judgment states that the respondent had not paid £856 in lieu of the accrued leave entitlement. The tribunal then ordered the respondent to pay £865.00 to the claimant as the gross sum due. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the judgment.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment contains no discrimination findings or other claims beyond the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unlawful deduction from wages for unpaid accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. It records £856 as the unpaid leave amount and orders payment of £865.00 gross; no further breakdown is given. | Upheld | — | £865 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £865
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.