Case 1403907/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Q Walker v Fonix AV Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403907/2020
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Q Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Rayner recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, and unfairly dismissed him. The judgment is brief and sets out the orders made rather than a detailed narrative of reasons.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £818.18 for the wages deduction, £375.00 for breach of contract, and £152.50 for unpaid holiday entitlement. In relation to unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £562.50 and a further £300.00 in respect of loss of employment rights.
The total amount payable was £2,208.18. The judgment was sent to the parties on 8 January 2021, following the date on the judgment of 4 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross/net sum of £818.18 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £818 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £375.00 damages. | Upheld | — | £375 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £152.50 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £153 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed; the judgment awarded a basic award of £562.50 and £300.00 compensation in respect of loss of employment rights. | Upheld | — | £863 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,208
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £563
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £300
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.