Case 1403908/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Cornaglia, counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403908/2020
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Cornaglia, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case, number 1403908/2020, was heard by Employment Judge Dawson at Southampton by CVP on 17 June 2021. The written record names the claimant as Mr C Irving and the respondent as Southampton City Council. Counsel appeared for both parties: Ms Cornaglia for the claimant and Mr Self for the respondent.
The judgment states in a single order that the claimant’s claim is dismissed. No written reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and the record notes that written reasons would only be provided if requested in accordance with the tribunal’s usual procedure.
The record does not set out the underlying facts, the legal basis of the claim, or any remedy analysis. It therefore records only the dismissal outcome and the procedural note that the hearing was conducted by video platform in public because a face-to-face hearing was not appropriate during the coronavirus restrictions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record states only that 'The claimant’s claim is dismissed.' It does not specify the legal cause of action in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.