Case 1403912/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hebditch v Weston Super Mare Town Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403912/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax
- Venue
- BRISTOL
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Hebditch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Hebditch, employed by Weston Super Mare Town Council as a box office administrator, brought a claim seeking a recalculation of holiday pay said to arise from regular overtime worked between January 2017 and July 2019. He said he had worked additional hours outside his contracted hours, mainly in the evenings, and that the accrued but untaken holiday associated with that overtime should be paid to him. He presented the claim on 25 July 2020 after ACAS early conciliation.
The tribunal dealt first with limitation. It held that the relevant time period started at the end of July 2019, when the claimant's contractual position changed, rather than in March 2020 when the holiday year ended. The claimant argued that holiday pay was calculated annually and that the amount due could only be known at the end of the holiday year, but the tribunal rejected that submission and held that the wages from which the alleged deduction was made were those paid by the end of July 2019.
The tribunal then considered whether it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time. It accepted that the claimant had raised the issue internally and had waited for an answer, but found that he was aware from at least April 2018 that he could bring a Tribunal claim, having accessed the ACAS website and having raised the matter with his line manager. It found that he had not been misled about his rights, that any fear of repercussions would not have been reasonable on the evidence, and that there was no illness or disability affecting his ability to claim. Referring to the test in Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, the tribunal concluded that the claim was not presented within the statutory time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to have done so. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction and dismissed the unlawful deduction of wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the complaint was out of time and therefore outside its jurisdiction. It found the relevant three-month period ran from the end of July 2019, rejected the argument that the holiday year meant the entitlement only became knowable by March 2020, and concluded it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(4A) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Bonha v Hampshire Area Health Authority
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.