Case 1403914/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Trowbridge and 19 others as per the attached schedule v Peeks of Bournemouth Limited (In Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403914/2020
- Decision date
- 1 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Trowbridge and 19 others as per the attached schedule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Peeks of Bournemouth Limited (In Liquidation), did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge J Bax heard the matter at Bristol on 25 June 2021 by CVP and gave oral reasons, with the written record sent to the parties on 1 July 2021.
The tribunal declared that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with a requirement of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It made a protective award for the claimants listed in the attached schedule, who were employees at the respondent's premises at Avon Trading Park, Reid Street, Christchurch, Dorset.
The award covered those employees who were dismissed as redundant on or after 1 May 2020. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 1 May 2020. The written record does not set out a monetary total in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal declared well founded the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULRCA and made a protective award in respect of the claimants listed in the schedule. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.