Case 1403938/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Lewis v Eric Robinson Solicitors Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403938/2020
- Decision date
- 20 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim in a judgment dated 20 July 2021. It recorded that by letter dated 23 June 2021 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 20 May 2021 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not follow, and she did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The hearing listed for 22 and 23 July 2021 did not take place. The judgment does not record any monetary award or substantive liability findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment says singular 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 20 May 2021 and did not actively pursue the case. The text does not specify the underlying legal label, but the GOV.UK listing category is Unfair Dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.