Case 1403939/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N C Manley v MYA Property Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403939/2019
- Decision date
- 14 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N C Manley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 14 May 2020, before Employment Judge Gray, the claimant was represented by Miss H Platt and the respondent by Mr C Dobbin. The written judgment records that the claimant gave notice by correspondence dated 7 May 2020 that she intended to withdraw her sex discrimination complaint, and she confirmed that withdrawal orally at the hearing.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the sex discrimination complaint on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability for that claim, because the complaint was not determined on the merits.
The judgment also states that the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal complaint continued. No further outcome or remedy is recorded in this written decision, and the note explains that reasons were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The claimant indicated by correspondence dated 7 May 2020 that she intended to withdraw the sex discrimination complaint and confirmed that withdrawal orally at the hearing on 14 May 2020. The judgment records that the complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.