Case 1403947/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Porter v Love 2 Care HomeCare Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403947/2021
- Decision date
- 3 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Porter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South West Employment Tribunals on 10 October 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Bax decided that judgment could properly be entered under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a hearing. The hearing listed for 1 April 2022 was cancelled.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The judgment therefore upheld the claim to that extent and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £521.46.
No separate award components were identified in the judgment beyond that gross sum, and no interest or additional remedy was recorded. The judgment was sent to the parties on 3 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £521.46. | Upheld | — | £521 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £521
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.