Case 1403964/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Avon v Andrew Peters T/A Green Park Express — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403964/2018
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mrs Howard, Ms Simmonds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Avon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Bristol heard the case on 7 October 2019 before Employment Judge Maxwell, sitting with Mrs Howard and Ms Simmonds. The claimant, Miss G Avon, appeared in person and the respondent, Andrew Peters T/A Green Park Express, was represented by Mr Maratos, Consultant.
In the judgment dated 8 October 2019, the tribunal recorded that both of the claimant's claims were not well-founded. The pregnancy discrimination claim was dismissed, and the unfair dismissal claim was also dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded and no further findings are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the pregnancy discrimination claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.