Case 1403976/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person Interpreter: Ms M. Leigh (Polish language) v Mr S. Verth CONSENT — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403976/2023
- Decision date
- 13 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person Interpreter: Ms M. Leigh (Polish language)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties agreed the terms set out in the schedule to the consent judgment. The judgment provides that the claim will be dismissed upon withdrawal 28 days after the judgment is sent to the parties, unless restored before then by the claimant.
The schedule records that the respondent will pay the claimant GBP 3,500 within 14 days. The judgment does not set out findings on liability, legal tests, or a breakdown of the payment by claim type.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment states the claim will be dismissed upon withdrawal after 28 days unless restored. The agreed payment is not allocated to individual claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Consent judgment states the claim will be dismissed upon withdrawal after 28 days unless restored. The agreed payment is not allocated to individual claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment states the claim will be dismissed upon withdrawal after 28 days unless restored. The agreed payment is not allocated to individual claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.