Case 1403993/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Pennington v Time2Care (Southwest)Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403993/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Pennington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Pennington succeeded in part on her wage-related claims against Time2Care (Southwest) Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages of £143.00 in respect of a DBS check, two uniforms and a parking permit.
The tribunal also found an unlawful deduction in respect of holiday pay. It calculated that sum as 10 hours' pay at £8.70 per hour, producing an award of £87.00.
The judgment records that the respondent will pay the claimant a total of £230.00 in respect of the unlawful deductions. The claimant's claim for any additional accrued holiday pay was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages of £143.00 in respect of a DBS check, two uniforms and a parking permit. | Upheld | — | £143 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction in respect of holiday pay equivalent to 10 hours at £8.70 per hour, totalling £87.00. The claim for any additional accrued holiday pay was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £87 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.