Case 1403993/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Clarke v Bristol Sport Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403993/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lowe Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a costs hearing in Mr R Clarke v Bristol Sport Limited, heard at Bristol by video platform on 10 June 2022 before Employment Judge Lowe. The Tribunal considered the Respondent’s application for costs on the basis of the Respondent’s written submissions and supporting documentation, and after hearing from the Claimant’s counsel in person.
The Tribunal dismissed the Respondent’s application for costs. The written record does not set out substantive reasons for the dismissal, stating only that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
No monetary award was made in this judgment, and the record does not contain findings on the underlying employment claims themselves. The only adjudicated matter recorded here is the respondent’s costs application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application for costs was considered at a costs hearing and dismissed. This judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.