Case 1404014/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Daniel Syms v AND Foxsrevenge Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404014/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Daniel Syms
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 16 January 2020 and proceeded under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been filed. The claimant was Mr Daniel Syms and the respondent was Foxsrevenge Limited.
The claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,751.22. No further reasoning, split award, or additional remedy was recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21; no valid response was presented. | Upheld | — | £2,751 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,751
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.